Thursday, July 28, 2016

Remember when Democrats Lionized Real Trators


Ted Kennedy's KGB Correspondence
By Kevin Mooney on Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010


Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's self-serving, secret correspondence with Soviet agents during the height of the Cold War included proposals for collaborative efforts designed to undermine official U.S. policy set by Democratic and Republican administrations, KGB documents show.

With the media now reporting on the late senator's just released Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) file, now is an opportune time for a more expansive investigation into Kennedy's KGB contacts. The agency took a keen interest in a 1961 "fact-finding" trip the Massachusetts Democrat took to Mexico and other parts of Latin America where he may have had contact with communist agents, according to the file.

However, the 2,352 pages of FBI files that cover a period ranging from 1961 to 1985 only tell a small part of the story and do not mention Kennedy's overtures to Soviet officials. These did not become known outside of Moscow until several years after Cold War tensions receded.

Kennedy's long history with the KGB is well documented, but underreported. It remains available through the writings of the now deceased Vasiliy Mitrokhin, who defected to Britain from the Soviet Union in 1992, and a separate 1983 memo addressed to then General Secretary Yuri Andropov. Kennedy's actions occurred at the expense of presidential authority and in violation of federal law, according to academics and scholars who are familiar with the documents.

The Mitrokhin papers highlight a meeting that took place at the behest of Kennedy between former Sen. John Tunney (D-Calif.) and KGB agents in Moscow on March 5, 1980. The information exchanged during this encounter is included as part of a report Mitrokhin filed with the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington D.C. The former KGB man continued to work with British intelligence until the time of his death.

Noted Cold War author and researcher Herbert Romerstein has described Mitrokhin as a "highly credible source" with vast knowledge of the now-closed KGB archives. Romerstein, who headed up the U.S. government's Office to Counter Soviet Disinformation and Active Measures during the 1980s, has explained in previous interviews that Mitrokhin made meticulous copies of KGB files by hand prior to his defection.

The KGB files Mitrokhin retrieved indicate that Kennedy fixed the blame for heightened international tensions on the Carter White House, not on the Kremlin. It is important to note that Kennedy was challenging incumbent Carter for the Democratic nomination for president at that time.

Tunney told his KGB counterparts that Kennedy was impressed by the foreign policy statements made by General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev. Kennedy saw in Brezhnev a leader who was firmly committed to the policy of "détente," the report said.

Moreover, Kennedy also blamed the Carter Administration for assuming an overly belligerent posture toward the Soviet Union after the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan, according to the papers.

"The atmosphere of tension and hostility towards the whole Soviet people was being fuelled by Carter," Kennedy argued, as well as by some key advisors, the Pentagon and the U.S. military industrial complex, Mitrokhin wrote.

KENNEDY ALSO OFFERED TO WORK in close concert with high level Soviet officials to sabotage President Ronald Reagan's re-election efforts and to orchestrate favorable American press coverage for Andropov and Soviet military officials, according to the 1983 KGB document.

Kennedy offered to have "representatives of the largest television companies in the U.S. contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview," KGB head Viktor Chebrikov explained in a letter to the general secretary dated May 14, 1983, the file shows. The idea here would be for the Soviet leader to make an end run around Reagan and make a direct appeal to the American people.

The KGB letter to Andropov first came to light in a Feb. 2, 1992 report published in the London Times entitled "Teddy, the KGB and the Top Secret File." Paul Kengor, a Grove City College political science professor, included the document in his 2006 book: The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and The Fall of Communism.

Kennedy suggested that Walter Cronkite, Barbara Walters and Elton Raul, the president of the board of directors for ABC, be considered for the interviews with Andropov in Moscow. He also asked the KGB to consider having "lower level Soviet officials, particularly the military" take part in television interviews inside the U.S. where they could convey peaceful intentions.

Tunney, the former senator, once again served as an intermediary traveling to Moscow in 1983 to relay Kennedy's intentions. In the interest of world peace and improved American-Soviet relations, the Massachusetts Democrat offered specific proposals built around a public relations effort designed to "counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people," Chebrikov wrote.

Although it is not made clear who Tunney actually met with in Moscow, the letter does say that Sen. Kennedy directed the California Democrat to reach out to "confidential contacts" so Andropov could be alerted to the senator's proposals.

"Tunney told his contacts that Kennedy was very troubled about the decline in U.S -Soviet relations under Reagan," Kengor the Grove City professor said in an interview. "But Kennedy attributed this decline to Reagan, not to the Soviets. In one of the most striking parts of this letter, Kennedy is said to be very impressed with Andropov and other Soviet leaders."

The pattern of behavior should concern members of both political parties, Kengor said, because it shows Kennedy was willing to work against American foreign policy, regardless of who occupied the White House.

In his book, Kengor points out that Tunney acknowledged making 15 separate trips to the Soviet Union where he acted as a conduit not only for Kennedy but for other U.S. senators.

Charles Dunn, dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University, describes Kennedy's actions as being in "clear violation of the U.S. Constitution and at the expense of presidential authority."

The secret overtures to the KGB during the Reagan years were particularly insidious, Dunn said, because Tunney and Kennedy were working to undermine what ultimately proved to be a very successful policy that brought an end to the Cold War.

"If another country gets the idea that it can deal outside of official channels then that undermines presidential leadership," Dunn added.

A strong case could also be made that Kennedy's Soviet overtures are in violation of the Logan Act, a federal law that has been in effect going back to 1799. The law prohibits American citizens from engaging in private diplomacy with a foreign government with the intention of influencing public policy, but it is rarely enforced.

There is no escaping the "blame America first" mentality that infects and animates Kennedy's communiqués.

"Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations," Chebrikov observes in the letter. "Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan's belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe. According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the president's refusal to engage in any modification of his policies."

Tunney also discussed Kennedy's presidential ambitions with the Soviet contacts, the letter shows. Kennedy was looking to run in 1988 when he would be remarried and his "personal problems" resolved. However, the letter also said he did not rule out 1984.

"Kennedy was afraid that Reagan was leading the world into a nuclear war," Kengor said. "He hoped to counter Reagan's policies, and by extension hurt his re-election prospects."

It is also evident from the letter that Kennedy believed the nuclear freeze movement was gaining momentum in 1983 and could help to short-circuit Reagan's military buildup. With the economic climate improving in the U.S., Reagan would only be vulnerable politically on matters of foreign policy, Kennedy informed the Soviets.

"The only real potential threats to Reagan (according to Kennedy) are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations," the KGB official explained to Andropov. "These issues will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign. The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States. The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth. In political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress, the resistance to growing military expenditures is gaining strength."

Media outlets that editorialized against Reagan's military buildup and in favor of disarmament have a special obligation to report on historical documents that provide fresh insight into policy disputes that shaped the final, pivotal years of Cold War.

Sunday, July 24, 2016

Will Bernie Sanders Bolt the Democrat Party?

Three days ago most people were looking at another boring, slickly produced Democrat convention.

Bernie Sanders was brought on board and publically endorsed Hillary Clinton to the surprise and disappointment of his supporters. The price Clinton paid was small. A few meaningless face saving planks in the platform and the promise to seriously consider a progressive VP pick.

However, developments in the past three days are posed to make the planned Democrat unity and serenity convention a mere fantasy.

The first of course is Clinton’s pick of Tim Kaine as her VP running mate. The pick had the progressive caucus, Sanders supporters, and other far left groups in the Democrat party howling their disapproval. (Even with a 100% Planned Parenthood rating his support for gun control, he’s not liberal enough.)

Even with this very public slapping it was unlikely that Sanders would not bolt. However, the second development may be the tipping point.

WikiLeaks is releasing to the public emails obtained from the DNC server that were hacked by a person known as Guccifer 2.0. These emails conclusively show that far from the “neutral” arbiter the DNC was supposed to be in the primaries, it was actively working for the nomination of Hillary Clinton. For all practical purposes, the DNC was a branch of the Clinton campaign organization.

Their emails outline strategies for discrediting, and defeating the Sanders insurgency. Including questioning Sanders religion in key primary states of Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee.

These emails reveal and absolute contempt for Sanders as well as the Democrat voters in these states. A contempt so prevalent that for Sanders it is an untenable humiliation.

It’s quite possible Sanders may bolt and rescind his endorsement.  His supporters may hold embarrassing demonstrations on the convention floor as well as outside the convention hall.

Update:
In an apparent peace bone to Bernie Sanders, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been uninvited from speaking at her own convention. 

Drudge now has the story in big bold headlines.

Second Update:
Debbie Wasserman Schultz will resign as DNC chairman and will take no part in her own convention. 

Team Clinton is in a panic.  

What will Bernie Do?  

Last Update: 

The answer is Bernie sold out his supporters to their great anger and disappointment.  However, far from the unity convention team Clinton hoped for, the anger and divisiveness continues. 

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

About Those Racist Cops

Judges and juries keep acquitting the cops whom Black Lives Matter calls racist

The repeated exoneration of allegedly racist cops by minority jurors and judges — from Ferguson and Staten Island to Cleveland and now Baltimore — seriously undermines the anti-cop movement started by Black Lives Matter and fueled by President Obama.
With half the Baltimore cops now acquitted in the death of Freddie Gray, a pattern has emerged where highly publicized cases against cops for racially motivated murder of black suspects have crumbled under the weight of court evidence.
It’s not to say these police officers made no procedural errors in their use of force, but they certainly did not commit the heinous civil-rights crimes the BLM movement accused them of committing. Even so, the movement continues to inspire fury against cops.

Do read the entire article. 

And if the case by case debunking of the myths was not enough, a new study by Harvard economics professor Robert G. Fryer Jr.  found "no racial bias in the use of the most lethal forms of force".  

In other words, the whole premise of the Black Lives Matter Movement is a lie. A lie perpetuated by black nationalist activist enabled by their liberal media allies.

A lie that was all too readily accepted and repeated by the current command in chief and his chief law enforcement officer. 

A pernicious lie that lead directly to the deaths of nine law enforcement officers in the last fourteen days; five in Dallas, three in Baton Rouge, and one in Kansas City. 

And yet with the overwhelming evidence of the lie, Hillary Clinton and the Democrats still persist in the lie, giving honored speaking slots to mothers of failed cop-killers at their convention. 

Their failed policies, divisiveness, and delusional thinking are only three of the many reasons why these people shouldn't be in power.

And has convince me that for all of his faults, Donald J. Trump is the better choice for president. 

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Why there are no great US Open Golf Championships

We just completed another great Open Golf Championship. (Hint: If you call it the “British Open” instead of just “The Open” you will be labeled an ignorant knave and you cannot set foot in Great Britain ever again.)

For two days over 36 holes Phil Mickelson and Henrik Stenson battle each other and the golf links at Royal Troon producing the greatest match in Open history since the dual in sun at Turnberry between Tom Watson and Jack Nicklaus.

Finally, Stenson took a two stroke lead with three holes to go to become the first Swede to win the gold medal.  (Yes, there’s a claret jug involved but the golfer gets to keep the gold medal.)

With all that excitement it occurred to me, can anyone name a great US Open golf match? For the life of me I can’t remember one.

I believe there are distinct reasons for this starting with the types of golf courses used in The Open Rota.

Without exception all of these golf courses are links style courses.  Links courses are almost always placed on the sea in the area above the mean high tide and the “useful” land. It is typically scrub land that is only good for grazing sheep. In other words, perfect for a pre-20th century golf course.

These courses typically have three defenses; rough, pot bunkers and wind. Typically, the fairways are narrow with deep rough and pot bunkers down the sides. Pot bunkers ring most of the greens and they usually play hard and fast.

Links courses put a premium on accuracy and experience rather than distance. Like the greens, the fairways play hard and fast and you can get quite a bit of roll out with your drive. Sometime more than you want, as more often than not a drive finds a pot bunker in the fairway.  That’s why you see pros use a 2-iron or 3-wood rather than a driver.

It’s no coincidence that this year’s champion is in his forties and he just barely defeated another past champion in his late forties.


The real wildcard however is the wind and the weather. There’s always a stiff breeze by the sea and the British weather is well, British weather.  Sometimes the sole determiner of whether you compete for the championship is the weather and the luck of the draw.

All of these factor however an experienced golfer can take into account. And while the rough and the pot bunkers may be a challenge they are not unduly punitive.  If the experience golfer finds a fairway bunker or the rough on his tee shot, he can still scramble for par.

The R&A (Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St. Andrews, governing body for British Golf) puts a premium on competition when they set up a golf course. There is the right mix of difficult holes and risk/reward holes.

The USGA on the other hand, puts a premium on a punitive golf course setup. Their goal is to protect par rather than promote great competition. They favor parkland courses with sand bunkers and deep punitive rough. The last two venues; Oakmont and Chambers Bay was ridiculously punitive.  Chamber's Bay was nothing more than a test to find the best hiker in golf while Oakmont punished even good shots from the fairway.


Punitive golf course setup does not encourage great competition it encourages cautious, defensive, and boring golf.  Until the USGA changes their tournament philosophy, we will not see great golf in the US Open. 

Friday, July 15, 2016

So Who is The Real Racist in This Election



You just know that if Hillary was a Republican it would have disqualified her from being president. 

The media would have been hounding her out of the race. 

As a great man once said, "Hypocrisy is the bedrock of Liberalism". 

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Bernie Sanders Betrays Supporters



What form did the 30 pieces if silver take?

A speaking gig at the convention and some meaningless planks in the platform.

Updated Swing State Polls:
Pennsylvania Quinnipiac: Trump 43, Clinton 41
Ohio Quinnipiac: Trump 41, Clinton 41
Florida Quinnipiac: Trump 42, Clinton 39

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

So Liberals Think People Don't Care About Hillary's Email Scandal

Hillary Clinton's Lead Over Trump Shrinks After Controversial Week: Poll

Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump narrowed to 3 points this week after several days of controversy following FBI Director James Comey's recommendation that no criminal charges be brought against the former secretary of state over her use of a private email server.

While the developments are certainly good news for the Clinton campaign, Comey's critical statement on Clinton's handling of the matter was not positive. Clinton's lead over Trump has deteriorated in the past couple weeks since her lead peaked two weeks ago.

A strong majority of voters (82 percent) agreed that it was inappropriate for Clinton to use a personal email server during her tenure as secretary of state. A smaller majority — 56 percent — also said they disagreed with Comey's recommendation that Clinton not be prosecuted for use of the server.

These results are according to the latest from the NBC News|SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking Poll conducted online from July 4 through July 10, 2016. Survey questions pertaining to Clinton's email controversy were added following Comey's announcement.
Apparently people are paying attention to the email scandal and they don't like what they see in Hillary Clinton.

Three points are within the margin of error so for all practical purposes the race is now a dead heat.

On top of it, Donald Trump has had a remarkably good week keeping to a discipline law and order message in his speeches and remarks.  As opposed to Clinton who honored criminals as victims this week, Trump positioned himself as the law and order candidate and explain why it's necessary for us to support the police as they "protect the poorest and most vulnerable among us."

He was the one public figure who was a uniter instead of a divider this week.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Liberals Think the Email Scandal Will Go Away

I'm not so sure.



From The Trump Campaign



From Reason Magazine.

Update: The RNC chimes in.

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

FBI Decision Leave American People Cold

The FBI decision to not recommend any charges against Hillary Clinton has convince people that “equal justice under the law” is now a sick joke in America.

In FBI director James Comey’s announcement today there are several things that were self-evident.

1. There was overwhelming evidence that Hillary Clinton violated Title 18 Section 793(f):
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

2. There is substantial evidence through removal of watermarks etc. that she violated sections of the Espionage act.

3. President Obama and attorney general Lynch for political reasons did not want her prosecuted.

This gross political interference in the FBI has shaken the people's confidence in the integrity of the bureau in particular and of the justice system in general.

It can never be said again with any degree of seriousness that there is “equal justice under the law”. Obama has corrupted the justice system to the point where only people receiving “justice” are wealthy and politically connected.

Saturday, July 2, 2016

Hillary Clinton Interviewed By The FBI Today

The over/under on the number of times she took the 5th?

15

To follow up on CH's post let me quote the following:

Title 18 U.S. Code Chapter 37 Subsection 798.  (Espionage Act) 

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—
(1) concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government; or
(2) concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or
(3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or 
(4) obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(b) As used in subsection (a) of this section—
The term “classified information” means information which, at the time of a violation of this section, is, for reasons of national security, specifically designated by a United States Government Agency for limited or restricted dissemination or distribution; 
The terms “code,” “cipher,” and “cryptographic system” include in their meanings, in addition to their usual meanings, any method of secret writing and any mechanical or electrical device or method used for the purpose of disguising or concealing the contents, significance, or meanings of communications; 
The term “foreign government” includes in its meaning any person or persons acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any faction, party, department, agency, bureau, or military force of or within a foreign country, or for or on behalf of any government or any person or persons purporting to act as a government within a foreign country, whether or not such government is recognized by the United States; 
The term “communication intelligence” means all procedures and methods used in the interception of communications and the obtaining of information from such communications by other than the intended recipients; 
The term “unauthorized person” means any person who, or agency which, is not authorized to receive information of the categories set forth in subsection (a) of this section, by the President, or by the head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities for the United States. 
It's obvious that Hillary Clinton knowingly and willingly exposed classified information on her private server and e-mail account.

Her legal argument is that she authorized herself to have a private server outside a secured government location.

Will it fly. We'll see.

Update:

On MSNBC Hillary Clinton stated the she first learned of her husband's meeting with Lynch "in the news" and that their meeting was a "chance encounter". 

Think about it. They will have you believe that two of the most highly protected persons in the world with secret service details having to coordinate security was a "chance encounter".

It's beyond belief that people would still vote for Hillary Clinton.